Ryzen 7 2700X vs Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ed
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
86.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
657.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
5.2k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
21.19k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.85k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
15.48k (x0.72)
TOTAL
51.17k
48.71k (x0.95)
Multithread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
42.31k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
198.07k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
68.37k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
7.38k (x0.9)
TOTAL
289.54k
316.12k (x1.09)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
18.76k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
27.15k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
7.15k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
15.31k (x0.73)
TOTAL
66.21k
68.37k (x1.03)
Multithread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
156.95k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
250.7k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
70.02k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
7.43k (x0.76)
TOTAL
428.19k
485.11k (x1.13)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
18.88k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
28.5k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
6.91k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
14.86k (x0.78)
TOTAL
64.24k
69.14k (x1.08)
Multithread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
157.47k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
265.75k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
68.86k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
7.38k (x0.75)
TOTAL
412.13k
499.47k (x1.21)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
33.92k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
30k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
7.01k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
15.73k (x0.86)
TOTAL
65.87k
86.65k (x1.32)
Multithread
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
302.78k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
278.98k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
67.89k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
7.53k (x0.92)
TOTAL
433.19k
657.19k (x1.52)
Performance/W
2700X
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W