Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
860f01
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
14.87k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
21.53k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
8.39k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
8.21k (x0.46)
TOTAL
64.83k
53k (x0.82)
Multithread
2700X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
124.63k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
158.62k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
69.79k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
7.53k (x0.92)
TOTAL
431.14k
360.57k (x0.84)
Performance/W
2700X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4