Ryzen 7 2700X vs 1700X
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
800f11
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
372.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
12.5k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
22.92k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.45k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
14.72k (x0.77)
TOTAL
64.24k
55.59k (x0.87)
Multithread
2700X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
92.51k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
144.76k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
54.43k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
22.08k (x2.23)
TOTAL
412.13k
313.78k (x0.76)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
13.72k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.48k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.12k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
15.44k (x0.86)
TOTAL
64.83k
56.76k (x0.88)
Multithread
2700X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
110.92k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
200.56k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
54.24k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
7.01k (x0.86)
TOTAL
431.14k
372.73k (x0.86)
Performance/W
2700X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4