Ryzen 7 2700X vs 1700
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
800f11
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
13.95k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
22.02k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.17k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
16.61k (x0.87)
TOTAL
64.24k
57.75k (x0.9)
Multithread
2700X
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
120.59k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
197.34k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
56.83k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
6.41k (x0.65)
TOTAL
412.13k
381.16k (x0.92)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
12.65k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
20.95k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.63k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
14.47k (x0.79)
TOTAL
65.87k
52.69k (x0.8)
Multithread
2700X
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
101.78k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
177.57k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
47.18k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
6.78k (x0.83)
TOTAL
433.19k
333.31k (x0.77)
Performance/W
2700X
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4