| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 5 5600X


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a20f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2018
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
435.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
23.28k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
25.58k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
11.72k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
25.45k (x1.42)
TOTAL
64.83k
86.03k (x1.33)

Multithread

2700X

5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
135.28k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
180.56k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
80.27k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
38.94k (x4.76)
TOTAL
431.14k
435.05k (x1.01)

Performance/W
2700X
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
6693 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4