Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
800f82
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
14.08k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.56k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.19k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
16.71k (x0.93)
TOTAL
64.83k
58.53k (x0.9)
Multithread
2700X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
86.62k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
168.1k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
43.51k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
5.16k (x0.63)
TOTAL
431.14k
303.4k (x0.7)
Performance/W
2700X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4