Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
Both models 2700X and 3200G are based on Zen+ architecture.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f81
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
3.89k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.94k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.34k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
6.62k (x0.31)
TOTAL
51.17k
33.79k (x0.66)
Multithread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
15.07k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
66.84k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
19.56k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
6.54k (x0.8)
TOTAL
289.54k
108.01k (x0.37)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
14.3k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
21.69k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.42k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
6.6k (x0.31)
TOTAL
66.21k
48k (x0.72)
Multithread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
55.45k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
83.13k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
20.76k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
6.58k (x0.67)
TOTAL
428.19k
165.91k (x0.39)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
13.05k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
22.88k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.39k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
7.31k (x0.38)
TOTAL
64.24k
48.63k (x0.76)
Multithread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
51.73k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
87.74k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
20.74k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
6.57k (x0.66)
TOTAL
412.13k
166.79k (x0.4)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
14.48k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
23.84k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.43k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
5.46k (x0.3)
TOTAL
65.87k
49.21k (x0.75)
Multithread
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
54.39k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
88.77k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
20.04k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
5.48k (x0.67)
TOTAL
433.19k
168.69k (x0.39)
Performance/W
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4