Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-1260P
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906a3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
391.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
41.94k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
26.81k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
12.63k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
13.51k (x0.74)
TOTAL
65.87k
94.9k (x1.44)
Multithread
2700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
168.12k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
148.09k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
60.28k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
14.58k (x1.79)
TOTAL
433.19k
391.07k (x0.9)
Performance/W
2700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
13967 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4