Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-11400
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
489.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
31.23k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
25.88k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
10.83k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
18.17k (x1.01)
TOTAL
64.83k
86.11k (x1.33)
Multithread
2700X
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
213.85k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
195.51k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
72.06k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
7.89k (x0.96)
TOTAL
431.14k
489.31k (x1.13)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
7528 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4