Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-11300H
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806c1
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
25.83k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
23.56k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
9.2k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
5.06k (x0.28)
TOTAL
64.83k
63.64k (x0.98)
Multithread
2700X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
116.87k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
121.08k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
41.8k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
6k (x0.73)
TOTAL
431.14k
285.75k (x0.66)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4