| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
806c1
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
3.75k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.22k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
9.79k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
8.21k (x0.38)
TOTAL
51.17k
38.97k (x0.76)

Multithread

2700X

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
9.19k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
35.47k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
19.14k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.82k (x0.71)
TOTAL
289.54k
69.62k (x0.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
12.9k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
21.4k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
10.73k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
8.16k (x0.39)
TOTAL
66.21k
53.19k (x0.8)

Multithread

2700X

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
30.31k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
45.13k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
20.17k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
5.77k (x0.59)
TOTAL
428.19k
101.38k (x0.24)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
14.65k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
21.57k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
9.93k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
8.02k (x0.42)
TOTAL
64.24k
54.18k (x0.84)

Multithread

2700X

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
32.14k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
43.54k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
19.58k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
5.61k (x0.57)
TOTAL
412.13k
100.87k (x0.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
24.25k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
21.63k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
9.09k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
7.23k (x0.39)
TOTAL
65.87k
62.19k (x0.94)

Multithread

2700X

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
56.9k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
55.68k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
19.29k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
6.09k (x0.75)
TOTAL
433.19k
137.96k (x0.32)

Performance/W
2700X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4