Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 2 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 2 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0655
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
35.87k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
31.43k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
7.34k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
15.73k (x0.97)
TOTAL
61.07k
90.37k (x1.48)
Multithread
1800X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
377.56k (x3.07)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
347.59k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
88.08k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
12.24k (x1.65)
TOTAL
410.47k
825.47k (x2.01)
Performance/W
1800X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4