Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i7-9700F
Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 276 k points while the i7-9700F gets 164.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 276 k points while the i7-9700F gets 164.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ed
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
269.85k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1800X
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.67k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
19.07k
17.16k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
5.7k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.28k
14.37k (x0.79)
TOTAL
47.26k
41.9k (x0.89)
Multithread
1800X
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
34.48k
26.31k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
169.65k
97.53k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.68k
31.53k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
8.94k (x1.09)
TOTAL
276.01k
164.31k (x0.6)
Performance/W
1800X
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
363 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1786 points/W
1500 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
670 points/W
485 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
138 points/W
TOTAL
2905 points/W
2528 points/W
Performance/GHz
1800X
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1036 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4767 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1442 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4570 points/GHz
3057 points/GHz
TOTAL
11816 points/GHz
8915 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4