| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i7-4820K


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 389.6 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.9 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
306e4
Core
Summit Ridge
Ivy Bridge -E
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
134.08k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1800X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.11k
11.85k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
11.84k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.64k
4.69k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.52k
4.12k (x0.24)
TOTAL
61.72k
32.49k (x0.53)

Multithread

1800X

i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
119.5k
47.65k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
198.79k
54.81k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.75k
21.56k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
10.05k (x0.87)
TOTAL
389.62k
134.08k (x0.34)

Performance/W
1800X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1258 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2092 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
4101 points/W
1031 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5866 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1409 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4379 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
15430 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4