| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i5-9500T


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
274.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1800X
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
3.73k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
19.07k
15.41k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
4.62k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.28k
10.59k (x0.58)
TOTAL
47.26k
34.35k (x0.73)

Multithread

1800X

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
34.48k
20.82k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
169.65k
85.48k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.68k
23.21k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.11k (x0.5)
TOTAL
276.01k
133.63k (x0.48)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1800X
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.11k
13.46k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
20.21k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.64k
4.72k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.52k
10.25k (x0.59)
TOTAL
61.72k
48.64k (x0.79)

Multithread

1800X

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
119.5k
74.65k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
198.79k
110.86k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.75k
22.08k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
4.12k (x0.36)
TOTAL
389.62k
211.7k (x0.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
24.5k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
21.41k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
4.82k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
10.73k (x0.66)
TOTAL
61.07k
61.46k (x1.01)

Multithread

1800X

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
134.63k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
113.61k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
21.71k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
4.07k (x0.55)
TOTAL
410.47k
274.02k (x0.67)

Performance/W
1800X
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4