| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i5-10400F


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1800X
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.3k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.07k
16.56k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
5.25k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.28k
12.61k (x0.69)
TOTAL
47.26k
38.72k (x0.82)

Multithread

1800X

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
34.48k
18.1k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
169.65k
79.16k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.68k
26.75k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
13.81k (x1.68)
TOTAL
276.01k
137.82k (x0.5)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
26.28k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
23.38k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
5.52k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
12.96k (x0.8)
TOTAL
61.07k
68.14k (x1.12)

Multithread

1800X

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
163.67k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
159.74k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
39k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
7.56k (x1.02)
TOTAL
410.47k
369.97k (x0.9)

Performance/W
1800X
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4