| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0652
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.11k
15.65k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
23.13k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.64k
5.66k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.52k
11.43k (x0.65)
TOTAL
61.72k
55.87k (x0.91)

Multithread

1800X

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
119.5k
26.77k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
198.79k
43.81k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.75k
10.17k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
11.91k (x1.03)
TOTAL
389.62k
92.66k (x0.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
27.14k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
24.75k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
5.73k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
11.84k (x0.73)
TOTAL
61.07k
69.47k (x1.14)

Multithread

1800X

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
105.77k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
107.47k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
24.82k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
8.02k (x1.08)
TOTAL
410.47k
246.07k (x0.6)

Performance/W
1800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4