| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Core i3-8350K


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.7 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906eb
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
95 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
237.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
27.29k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
24.19k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
5.75k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
11.13k (x0.68)
TOTAL
61.07k
68.36k (x1.12)

Multithread

1800X

i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
107.78k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
95.93k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
22.65k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
11.26k (x1.51)
TOTAL
410.47k
237.63k (x0.58)

Performance/W
1800X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
2611 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4