| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.3 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
860f01
Core
Summit Ridge
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
15.5k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
22.96k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
8.78k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
8.5k (x0.52)
TOTAL
61.07k
55.74k (x0.91)

Multithread

1800X

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
110.78k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
149.38k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
60.88k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
6.68k (x0.9)
TOTAL
410.47k
327.72k (x0.8)

Performance/W
1800X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4