| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1800X vs Ryzen 5 4600H


Description
The 1800X is based on Zen architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1800X gets a score of 410.5 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
860f01
Core
Summit Ridge
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.07k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
410.47k points
334.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1800X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
15.48k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
24.26k
22.82k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.53k
8.63k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.26k
7.17k (x0.44)
TOTAL
61.07k
54.11k (x0.89)

Multithread

1800X

4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.92k
117.98k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
220.32k
146.43k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.78k
65.54k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.44k
4.77k (x0.64)
TOTAL
410.47k
334.72k (x0.82)

Performance/W
1800X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1294 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2319 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
4321 points/W
7438 points/W

Performance/GHz
1800X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3756 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1382 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4065 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
15267 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4