| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.7 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
50657
Core
Summit Ridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2017
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
216.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
12.92k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
10.97k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
2.54k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
5.09k (x0.33)
TOTAL
56.76k
31.52k (x0.56)

Multithread

1700X

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
103.33k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
87.67k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
20.1k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
4.91k (x0.7)
TOTAL
372.73k
216.02k (x0.58)

Performance/W
1700X
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4