| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0652
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
349.21k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
16.71k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
25.45k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
6.06k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
13.2k (x0.9)
TOTAL
55.59k
61.43k (x1.1)

Multithread

1700X

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
67.59k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
111.94k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
27.7k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
5.3k (x0.24)
TOTAL
313.78k
212.53k (x0.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
29.06k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
26.49k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
6.23k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
13.89k (x0.9)
TOTAL
56.76k
75.67k (x1.33)

Multithread

1700X

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
154.61k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
151.34k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
36.33k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
6.93k (x0.99)
TOTAL
372.73k
349.21k (x0.94)

Performance/W
1700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4