Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-1065G7
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
706e5
Core
Summit Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
214.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
28.19k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
22.13k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
10.32k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
14.17k (x0.92)
TOTAL
56.76k
74.82k (x1.32)
Multithread
1700X
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
86.39k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
86.22k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
32.99k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
8.75k (x1.25)
TOTAL
372.73k
214.34k (x0.58)
Performance/W
1700X
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
14289 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4