Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i5-9300H
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
244.1k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
26.62k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
23.38k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.52k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
12.05k (x0.78)
TOTAL
56.76k
67.57k (x1.19)
Multithread
1700X
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
107.95k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
104.02k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
24.4k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
7.74k (x1.1)
TOTAL
372.73k
244.1k (x0.65)
Performance/W
1700X
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2312 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
542 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
5424 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6493 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5703 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2938 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
16480 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4