| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i5-10400T


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
307.18k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
12.5k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
19.05k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
4.72k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
10.3k (x0.7)
TOTAL
55.59k
46.57k (x0.84)

Multithread

1700X

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
74.58k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
126.96k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
31.76k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
2.5k (x0.11)
TOTAL
313.78k
235.8k (x0.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
22k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
19.98k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.57k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
11.31k (x0.73)
TOTAL
56.76k
57.85k (x1.02)

Multithread

1700X

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
136.69k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
135.25k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
32.76k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
2.48k (x0.35)
TOTAL
372.73k
307.18k (x0.82)

Performance/W
1700X
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4