| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i5-10200H


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0652
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
260.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
26.37k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
23.91k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
11.68k (x0.76)
TOTAL
56.76k
67.53k (x1.19)

Multithread

1700X

i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
114.08k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
114.71k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
27.33k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
4.25k (x0.61)
TOTAL
372.73k
260.38k (x0.7)

Performance/W
1700X
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
7439 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4