| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 3.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806ec
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
106.58k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
14.25k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
21.55k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.16k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
4.26k (x0.29)
TOTAL
55.59k
45.22k (x0.81)

Multithread

1700X

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
26.15k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
44.03k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
10.71k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
3.28k (x0.15)
TOTAL
313.78k
84.17k (x0.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
24.6k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
22.32k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.02k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
4.7k (x0.3)
TOTAL
56.76k
56.64k (x1)

Multithread

1700X

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
47.98k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
44.28k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
10.33k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
3.98k (x0.57)
TOTAL
372.73k
106.58k (x0.29)

Performance/W
1700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4