| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i3-10105


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
253.93k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
16.11k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
24.12k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.71k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
7.89k (x0.54)
TOTAL
55.59k
53.83k (x0.97)

Multithread

1700X

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
58.25k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
105.73k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
27.8k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
3.51k (x0.16)
TOTAL
313.78k
195.29k (x0.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
28.9k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
25.85k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.88k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
8.29k (x0.54)
TOTAL
56.76k
68.92k (x1.21)

Multithread

1700X

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
111.69k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
110.23k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
28.45k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
3.56k (x0.51)
TOTAL
372.73k
253.93k (x0.68)

Performance/W
1700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4