| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 9 3900X


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
870f10
Core
Summit Ridge
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
756.3k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
16.95k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
25.37k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
9.23k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
24.83k (x1.69)
TOTAL
55.59k
76.38k (x1.37)

Multithread

1700X

3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
196.31k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
290.5k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
143.95k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
64.92k (x2.94)
TOTAL
313.78k
695.69k (x2.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
16.73k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
24.74k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
8.82k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
22.22k (x1.44)
TOTAL
56.76k
72.51k (x1.28)

Multithread

1700X

3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
248.24k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
309.66k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
140.01k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
58.39k (x8.34)
TOTAL
372.73k
756.3k (x2.03)

Performance/W
1700X
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
7203 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4