| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs 4800H


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
860f01
Core
Summit Ridge
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
16.59k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
23.51k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
9.38k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
7.98k (x0.52)
TOTAL
56.76k
57.47k (x1.01)

Multithread

1700X

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
152.43k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
195.79k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
83.2k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
5.38k (x0.77)
TOTAL
372.73k
436.8k (x1.17)

Performance/W
1700X
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4