Ryzen 7 1700X vs 3800X
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
870f10
Core
Summit Ridge
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
497.74k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
16.76k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
25.16k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
8.76k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
24.3k (x1.65)
TOTAL
55.59k
74.98k (x1.35)
Multithread
1700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
131.36k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
198.51k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
97.27k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
13.4k (x0.61)
TOTAL
313.78k
440.54k (x1.4)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
17.1k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
26.59k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
8.91k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
23.21k (x1.5)
TOTAL
56.76k
75.81k (x1.34)
Multithread
1700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
172.04k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
214.03k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
97.1k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
14.57k (x2.08)
TOTAL
372.73k
497.74k (x1.34)
Performance/W
1700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4