Ryzen 7 1700X vs 2700X
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
800f82
Core
Summit Ridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
431.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
14.44k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
24.92k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.8k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
19.07k (x1.3)
TOTAL
55.59k
64.24k (x1.16)
Multithread
1700X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
122.01k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
220.34k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
59.89k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
9.9k (x0.45)
TOTAL
313.78k
412.13k (x1.31)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
15.34k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
25.75k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.79k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
17.95k (x1.16)
TOTAL
56.76k
64.83k (x1.14)
Multithread
1700X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
123.07k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
239.3k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
60.6k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
8.18k (x1.17)
TOTAL
372.73k
431.14k (x1.16)
Performance/W
1700X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4