Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.1 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.1 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
860f01
Core
Summit Ridge
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
15.5k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
22.96k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
8.78k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
8.5k (x0.55)
TOTAL
56.76k
55.74k (x0.98)
Multithread
1700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
110.78k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
149.38k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
60.88k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
6.68k (x0.95)
TOTAL
372.73k
327.72k (x0.88)
Performance/W
1700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4