Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
168.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
13.05k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
22.88k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.39k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
7.31k (x0.5)
TOTAL
55.59k
48.63k (x0.87)
Multithread
1700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
51.73k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
87.74k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
20.74k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
6.57k (x0.3)
TOTAL
313.78k
166.79k (x0.53)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
14.48k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
23.84k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.43k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
5.46k (x0.35)
TOTAL
56.76k
49.21k (x0.87)
Multithread
1700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
54.39k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
88.77k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
20.04k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
5.48k (x0.78)
TOTAL
372.73k
168.69k (x0.45)
Performance/W
1700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4