| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i9-12900KF


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 3.3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
90672
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2017
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
28.96k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
30k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
16.94k (x3.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
17.14k (x1.16)
TOTAL
55.59k
93.05k (x1.67)

Multithread

1700X

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
166.25k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
172.03k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
96.95k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
55.78k (x2.53)
TOTAL
313.78k
491.01k (x1.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
57.05k (x4.16)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
29.66k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
16.48k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
17.78k (x1.15)
TOTAL
56.76k
120.97k (x2.13)

Multithread

1700X

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
546.04k (x4.92)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
437.01k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
211.36k (x3.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
24.92k (x3.56)
TOTAL
372.73k
1219.33k (x3.27)

Performance/W
1700X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4