Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-12700
Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.9 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.9 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
90672
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/20
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
25600 kB
Date
March 2017
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
698.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
48.39k (x3.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
26.92k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
13.37k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
15.34k (x0.99)
TOTAL
56.76k
104.01k (x1.83)
Multithread
1700X
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
415.67k (x3.75)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
158.57k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
109.37k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
14.72k (x2.1)
TOTAL
372.73k
698.34k (x1.87)
Performance/W
1700X
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
10744 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700X
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4