| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i3-12100F


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
90675
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
95 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
39.54k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.48k
23.79k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
11.96k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.44k
13.52k (x0.88)
TOTAL
56.76k
88.81k (x1.56)

Multithread

1700X

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
110.92k
148k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
200.56k
123.08k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.24k
52.73k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.01k
16.67k (x2.38)
TOTAL
372.73k
340.49k (x0.91)

Performance/W
1700X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2111 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
571 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5916 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4063 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
14938 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4