Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core m7-6Y75
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 7.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 7.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
406e3
Core
Summit Ridge
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
65 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
10.24k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
15.33k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
2.97k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
5.32k (x0.32)
TOTAL
57.75k
33.86k (x0.59)
Multithread
1700
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
16.78k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
25.09k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
6.14k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
5.58k (x0.87)
TOTAL
381.16k
53.58k (x0.14)
Performance/W
1700
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1855 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3036 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
5864 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3770 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5952 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1397 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4490 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
15609 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4