| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7-4790


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
306c3
Core
Summit Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
173.89k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
14.07k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
12.63k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.35k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
4.98k (x0.3)
TOTAL
57.75k
37.03k (x0.64)

Multithread

1700

i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
57.88k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
60.83k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
24.4k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
6.95k (x1.09)
TOTAL
381.16k
150.07k (x0.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
22.19k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
12.45k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
5.11k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
4.98k (x0.34)
TOTAL
52.69k
44.73k (x0.85)

Multithread

1700

i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
87.14k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
58k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
22.75k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
6k (x0.88)
TOTAL
333.31k
173.89k (x0.52)

Performance/W
1700
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
1037 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
691 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
2070 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4