| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7-3770K


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the i7-3770K gets 133.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
306a9
Core
Summit Ridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
36.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
133.88k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
12.99k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
12.42k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.04k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
5.73k (x0.35)
TOTAL
57.75k
36.19k (x0.63)

Multithread

1700

i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
50.36k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
55.16k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
23.31k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
5.05k (x0.79)
TOTAL
381.16k
133.88k (x0.35)

Performance/W
1700
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
1855 points/W
654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3036 points/W
716 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
5864 points/W
1739 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i7-3770K
Test#1 (Integers)
3770 points/GHz
3331 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5952 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1397 points/GHz
1292 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4490 points/GHz
1470 points/GHz
TOTAL
15609 points/GHz
9280 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4