| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7-10870H


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.5 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0652
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
487.05k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.14k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
24.74k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.98k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
12.7k (x0.76)
TOTAL
57.75k
59.55k (x1.03)

Multithread

1700

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
117.03k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
199.88k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
50.64k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
8.23k (x1.28)
TOTAL
381.16k
375.77k (x0.99)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
30.38k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
27.95k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
6.51k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
14.37k (x0.99)
TOTAL
52.69k
79.2k (x1.5)

Multithread

1700

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
216.18k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
210.82k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
51.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
8.47k (x1.25)
TOTAL
333.31k
487.05k (x1.46)

Performance/W
1700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4