| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i5-10500T


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
302.13k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
14.01k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
21.17k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.21k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
11.42k (x0.69)
TOTAL
57.75k
51.82k (x0.9)

Multithread

1700

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
82.38k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
115.64k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
32.22k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
3.71k (x0.58)
TOTAL
381.16k
233.94k (x0.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
25.16k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
22.28k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
5.18k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
11.97k (x0.83)
TOTAL
52.69k
64.6k (x1.23)

Multithread

1700

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
144.86k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
120.98k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
32.55k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.73k (x0.55)
TOTAL
333.31k
302.13k (x0.91)

Performance/W
1700
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4