| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
706e5
Core
Summit Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
142.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
13.9k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
20.13k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.41k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
10.59k (x0.64)
TOTAL
57.75k
54.03k (x0.94)

Multithread

1700

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
55.4k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
59.01k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
22.83k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
6.7k (x1.05)
TOTAL
381.16k
143.94k (x0.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
25.53k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
19.99k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
9.31k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
10.81k (x0.75)
TOTAL
52.69k
65.64k (x1.25)

Multithread

1700

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
58.46k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
57.31k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
20.1k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
6.81k (x1)
TOTAL
333.31k
142.69k (x0.43)

Performance/W
1700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4