| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
706e5
Core
Summit Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
171.65k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
13.58k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
19.53k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.37k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
9.23k (x0.56)
TOTAL
57.75k
51.7k (x0.9)

Multithread

1700

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
56.25k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
73.73k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
29.56k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
5.39k (x0.84)
TOTAL
381.16k
164.94k (x0.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
21.5k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
17.71k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
7.92k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
8.24k (x0.57)
TOTAL
52.69k
55.37k (x1.05)

Multithread

1700

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
73.03k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
68.19k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
24.89k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
5.54k (x0.82)
TOTAL
333.31k
171.65k (x0.51)

Performance/W
1700
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4