| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-9100T


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906eb
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
192.88k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
13.6k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
20.58k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.76k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
8.8k (x0.53)
TOTAL
57.75k
47.74k (x0.83)

Multithread

1700

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
50.18k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
75.99k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
17.66k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
4.12k (x0.64)
TOTAL
381.16k
147.95k (x0.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
24.89k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
21.82k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
4.83k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
8.63k (x0.6)
TOTAL
52.69k
60.16k (x1.14)

Multithread

1700

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
89.4k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
81.19k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
18.06k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
4.24k (x0.63)
TOTAL
333.31k
192.88k (x0.58)

Performance/W
1700
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4