Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-4160
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306c3
Core
Summit Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
65 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2017
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
74k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
13.02k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
12k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.91k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
4.23k (x0.25)
TOTAL
57.75k
34.16k (x0.59)
Multithread
1700
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
27.45k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
28.96k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
11.83k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
5.77k (x0.9)
TOTAL
381.16k
74k (x0.19)
Performance/W
1700
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
1855 points/W
508 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3036 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
219 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5864 points/W
1370 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3770 points/GHz
3616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5952 points/GHz
3334 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1397 points/GHz
1363 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4490 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
TOTAL
15609 points/GHz
9488 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4