| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806ec
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
106.58k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
14.25k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
21.55k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.16k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
4.26k (x0.26)
TOTAL
57.75k
45.22k (x0.78)

Multithread

1700

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
26.15k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
44.03k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
10.71k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
3.28k (x0.51)
TOTAL
381.16k
84.17k (x0.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
24.6k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
22.32k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
5.02k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
4.7k (x0.32)
TOTAL
52.69k
56.64k (x1.07)

Multithread

1700

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
47.98k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
44.28k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
10.33k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.98k (x0.59)
TOTAL
333.31k
106.58k (x0.32)

Performance/W
1700
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4