| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-10100T


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
227.67k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
13.88k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
20.94k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.18k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
8.2k (x0.49)
TOTAL
57.75k
48.19k (x0.83)

Multithread

1700

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
54.88k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
93.17k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
23.34k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
3.85k (x0.6)
TOTAL
381.16k
175.24k (x0.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
24.31k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
22.15k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
5.14k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
8.46k (x0.58)
TOTAL
52.69k
60.06k (x1.14)

Multithread

1700

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
101.48k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
98.04k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
24.28k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.86k (x0.57)
TOTAL
333.31k
227.67k (x0.68)

Performance/W
1700
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4