Ryzen 7 1700 vs 2700X
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
800f82
Core
Summit Ridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
431.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
14.44k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
24.92k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.8k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
19.07k (x1.15)
TOTAL
57.75k
64.24k (x1.11)
Multithread
1700
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
122.01k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
220.34k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
59.89k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
9.9k (x1.55)
TOTAL
381.16k
412.13k (x1.08)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
15.34k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
25.75k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
5.79k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
17.95k (x1.24)
TOTAL
52.69k
64.83k (x1.23)
Multithread
1700
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
123.07k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
239.3k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
60.6k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
8.18k (x1.21)
TOTAL
333.31k
431.14k (x1.29)
Performance/W
1700
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4