| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806c1
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
137.96k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
14.65k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
21.57k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.93k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
8.02k (x0.48)
TOTAL
57.75k
54.18k (x0.94)

Multithread

1700

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
32.14k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
43.54k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
19.58k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
5.61k (x0.88)
TOTAL
381.16k
100.87k (x0.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
24.25k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
21.63k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
9.09k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
7.23k (x0.5)
TOTAL
52.69k
62.19k (x1.18)

Multithread

1700

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
56.9k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
55.68k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
19.29k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
6.09k (x0.9)
TOTAL
333.31k
137.96k (x0.41)

Performance/W
1700
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4